Sunday, December 24, 2017

Fire broke out at London Zoo on Saturday morning, severely damaging a cafe and shop and killing an aardvark. Zoo officials said four meerkats were missing and were also presumed to be dead.

The fire, mostly in the Animal Adventure cafe and shop, also spread to a nearby petting area. Reportedly, 72 firefighters with ten fire engines fought the blaze for about three hours starting shortly after 6:00 am to bring it under control. A spokesperson for the Fire Brigade stated that when they arrived, the fire was already “very well developed”. According to the ambulance service, two people were treated for minor injuries, six for smoke inhalation, with one taken to hospital. A statement from the zoo said, regarding animal fatalities, “Sadly our vets have confirmed the death of our nine-year-old aardvark, Misha. There are also four meerkats unaccounted for at this stage, and we have limited access to site to confirm this.” Other animals were said to be apparently unaffected.

The zoo reported quick response by zoo security guards and by animal care staff who are housed at the zoo, which is in Regents Park; they moved animals to safety. A dog walker, Adnan Abdul Husein, told the BBC he had first noticed heavy smoke and alerted zoo security guards.

Zoo officials initially said the zoo would be closed “until further notice” but later announced it would reopen today, Christmas Eve.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=England:_Fire_at_London_Zoo_kills_aardvark,_meerkats_believed_dead&oldid=4373425”
Posted in Uncategorized

byAlma Abell

Window cleaning for your commercial property ensures that you present your best image to your clients and customers. Dirty and cloudy windows send a message of disrepair and that is not a good presentation to make. For this reason, it is imperative to find a window cleaning company in your local area of Charleston, SC who can help you keep your property looking its very best at all times. With adequate window cleaning, your business will be kept well and serviced properly so that you can enjoy a clear and pristine view while feeling confident that your property looks its very best.

Improve your image

One of the facts you should know is that clean windows always improve your image. They show that the business owner is meticulous about the condition of their property and that they are also likely to handle business deals with the same level of attention. Many people forget that it is in the small details that all the difference is made. When it comes to window cleaning, finding the best service provider in Charleston, SC will help improve your image each and every time.

Create a clear view

Viewing the outdoors boosts morale and improves the atmosphere inside the office. When your windows are dull and cloudy, the view is obstructed. This is one of the most important facts about commercial window cleaning that you should be aware of. Getting a professional company to clean out the dirty windows is sure to have the desired effect of improving the view so everyone can enjoy a clear and unobstructed influx of light into the office environment.

Heat Efficiency indoors

Another fact about window cleaning that Charleston, SC property owners should be aware of is that when the light enters the indoors through your windows, it keeps the interior warm and bright. Improperly cleaned windows will have the unwanted effect of keeping this natural warming agent out. When you keep your windows in the best condition, you can enjoy the benefits of clean windows and increased energy efficiency.

Keeping these basic facts in mind will help you to understand the importance of proper window cleaning in Charleston, SC. You can find a reputable company online who can help you with all of your window cleaning needs.

Summit Building Services Inc. can help you with all of your window cleaning needs in Charleston, SC. Find out what a difference they can make when you visit them online.

Posted in Home Care Services

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Copies of The Profit, a 2001 film blocked from distribution in the United States due to a court injunction won by the Church of Scientology, appeared on the Internet Friday on peer-to-peer file-sharing websites and on the video sharing site YouTube.

Directed by former film executive Peter N. Alexander, the movie has been characterized by critics as a parody of Scientology and of its founder L. Ron Hubbard. Alexander was a Scientologist for twenty years, and left the organization in 1997. The film was funded by Bob Minton, a former critic of Scientology who later signed an agreement with the Church of Scientology and has attempted to stop distribution of the film. Alexander has stated that the movie is based on his research into cults, and when asked by the St. Petersburg Times about parallels to Scientology and L. Ron Hubbard said: “I’ll let you draw that conclusion … I say it’s entirely fictional.”

The film was released in August 2001, and was shown at a movie theatre in Clearwater, Florida and at a premiere at the Cannes Film Festival in France. A Scientology spokesman gave a statement at the time saying “the movie is fiction and has nothing to do with Scientology”. The Church of Scientology later took legal action in an attempt to stop further distribution of the film. The Church of Scientology claimed that the film was intended to influence the jury pool in the wrongful death case of Scientologist Lisa McPherson, who died under Scientology care in Clearwater, Florida.

In April 2002, a Pinellas County, Florida judge issued a court order enjoining The Profit from worldwide distribution for an indefinite period. According to the original court injunction received by Wikinews, the movie was originally banned because the court found that it could be seen as a parody of Scientology. In his April 20, 2002 ruling on the injunction, Judge Robert E. Beach of the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court in Pinellas County, Florida wrote: “…an average person viewing the film entitled The Profit could perceive that it is a parody of the Church of Scientology”.

“To the extent that any person considered as a potential juror in evaluating any issues involving the Church of Scientology, the process of voir dire provides a fair and complete remedy to eliminate any potential juror that may possibly have been influenced to be less than fair and impartial,” added Beach.

Luke Lirot, the attorney for the film’s production company, announced on the film’s website on April 7, 2007 that “We have absolutely no exposure for any repercussions from the court order,” but that the film was still blocked from distribution due to an ongoing legal battle. Lirot wrote: “all that’s stopping the release of the movie is the legal battle with the partner who was compromised by Scientology (Robert Minton) and is currently using his power as partner to stop the release of the film.”

In an October 2007 article, The Times described the film as “banned in the US because of a lawsuit taken out against it by The Church of Scientology,” and Russ Kick’s The Disinformation Book of Lists included the film in his “List of 16 Movies Banned in the U.S.”. An 8-minute teaser segment from The Profit appeared on the film’s website and on the video sharing site YouTube in February 2008, and an attorney representing Bob Minton sent a letter to Luke Lirot requesting that the film clip be taken down. In a response letter, Lirot wrote that “Rather than damage any asset of the LLC, the short clip merely keeps the film in the public eye, and in a positive way.”

On Friday, copies of the film began to circulate on peer-to-peer file-sharing websites and on YouTube. A link related to the film’s appearance on the Internet on the community-based link aggregator website Digg.com had 3,638 “Diggs” – and hit the front page of the site’s Entertainment section on Saturday.

I had nothing to do with this release at all. But I’m happy it’s out there.

On Saturday, Scientology critic and Emmy award-winning journalist Mark Bunker put a streaming version of the film on his website, www.xenutv.com, and encouraged others to watch and discuss the film on a real-time chat channel. In a video posting to YouTube Saturday, Bunker said “I did not do it. I had nothing to do with it … I had nothing to do with this release at all. But I’m happy it’s out there … people are finally having a chance to see it. A lot of people have been curious over the years and there’s been a lot of interest in seeing the film, so finally you can.”

We have all wanted to see this movie that scientology kept hidden away from us. We have all wondered just how damning could this story be that we were banned from watching it.

On the newsgroup alt.religion.scientology, a poster by the username “Alexia Death” commented on the film’s appearance on the Internet in the context of censorship: “It is out! And so it is a WIN if many people review it even if they say it SUCKS! … Being bad is no cause to allow censorship … And being censored is no cause to assume its good”. A post to the blog Blogsreel commented: “We have all wanted to see this movie that scientology kept hidden away from us. We have all wondered just how damning could this story be that we were banned from watching it.”

In a post on Sunday to the message board attached to the official website for the film, attorney Luke Lirot asked that individuals stop distributing copies of The Profit over the Internet. Lirot wrote: “It has been brought to my attention that several unauthorized transmissions and downloads of this protected work have taken place over the last 72 hours. Such actions are copyright violations and are unlawful. I request that any further distribution and/or dissemination of this important work cease immediately and any copies of the work that have been downloaded please be deleted.” In his statement, Lirot recognized the rights of individuals under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, but also said that unauthorized distribution of the film “will only serve to harm the goal of vast distribution”.

Blog postings have attributed the film’s appearance on the Internet as part of the anti-Scientology movement Project Chanology organized by the Internet-based group Anonymous, but this has not been confirmed. Wikinews previously reported on international protests against Scientology which took place as part of Project Chanology on February 10 and March 15. A third international protest by Anonymous is scheduled for April 12. Titled “Operation Reconnect”, the third international protest will focus on highlighting Scientology’s practice of disconnection.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Banned_film_%27The_Profit%27_appears_on_Web&oldid=4579693”
Posted in Uncategorized

byAlma Abell

Underground ductwork is becoming more and more common in recent years. This is because there are several advantages of running your ductwork underground. This allows for reduced costs in the long run. Underground ductwork does not have to be insulated in most cases, since there is not air exposure. This removes a common area of failure from your system. This system will also allow you to run HVAC for multiple buildings from one central location rather than having multiple units for each building and having to place them all. Here are just a couple of things to think about when you are deciding on an underground ductwork system.

Buried or Cemented?

This is going to be a decision to make early on. Do you want your system buried or would you rather have it cemented? The best choice is to have your ductwork cemented, but this can add thousands to installation costs. The advantages here though are numerous. You don’t have to worry about your ductwork being damaged from outside, since it is encased in concrete for one. Another major advantage is that it is not going to wear out over time like ductwork that is buried in the ground can. A buried system is constantly exposed to moisture which can shorten its life.

Materials

Making sure you choose the right materials is another very important decision you must make. You will have to choose between rigid or flexible piping. Yes, in some instances you must use flexible piping, but for the most part you can choose. Flexible piping has the advantage of being able to bend and flex, but it is not as structurally strong as rigid piping. Rigid piping is going to stand up to a lot more abuse that flexible piping, but it is not going to flex, so if you live in an area where earthquakes are common you may be better served with flex pipe.

Posted in Pipes

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

The following is the third edition of a monthly series chronicling the U.S. 2016 presidential election. It features original material compiled throughout the previous month after an overview of the month’s biggest stories.

In this month’s edition on the campaign trail: two individuals previously interviewed by Wikinews announce their candidacies for the Reform Party presidential nomination; a former Republican Congressman comments on the Republican National Convention; and Wikinews interviews an historic Democratic National Convention speaker.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=On_the_campaign_trail_in_the_USA,_July_2016&oldid=4588770”
Posted in Uncategorized

The time is 23:00 (UTC) on July 18th, 2006 and this is Audio Wikinews News Briefs.

[edit]

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=News_briefs:July_18,_2006&oldid=428340”
Posted in Uncategorized

Are you suffering from a chronic condition like osteoporosis or arthritis? Do you have a joint, muscle, or bone injury? If so, you should see an orthopedic surgeon. Orthopedists treat musculoskeletal problems, such as joint and spine injuries. Here are six interesting facts about these specialists. Don’t select one to help you until you read the following information!Orthopedists treat arthritis, dislocated or broken bones, sports injuries, and osteoporosis. They treat infections, fractures, tumors, pulled tendons or muscles, sprains, strains, knee and hip problems, and bursitis. In addition, orthopedists treat back pain, nerve diseases, and shoulder injuries. They also see many patients with rotator cuff or carpal tunnel injuries. The work an orthopedic surgeon does depends on the specialty they select.Orthopedists see patients in a variety of practice settings. Many orthopedists work for themselves. Some orthopedists work in schools, hospitals, and outpatient ambulatory surgical centers. Other orthopedists practice in groups. In some cases, three to ten orthopedists work together, seeing each other’s patients. Some work together with other professionals, such as doctors of internal medicine, family physicians, and cardiologists.Orthopedic surgeons are highly educated. They must complete a four-year bachelor degree, four-year medical degree, an internship, and residency training. Many orthopedists spend an additional a year in training in a subspecialty. Examples of orthopedic subspecialty training in the U.S. are spine surgery, foot and ankle surgery, hand surgery, pediatric orthopedics, shoulder and elbow surgery, musculoskeletal oncology, and total joint reconstruction.An orthopedic surgeon uses a variety of diagnostic tests to help identify the specific nature of a patient’s musculoskeletal condition or injury. Some of the most commonly used diagnostic tests for musculoskeletal conditions and injuries include arthrography, blood tests, bone scans, CT scans, MRIs, Electromyography, muscle tests, joint aspiration and analysis, flexibility tests, and others. Orthopedic specialists are experts in surgical and non-surgical treatments for a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Although orthopedic specialists spend a lot of time performing surgery, they also prescribe other types of rehabilitative treatments for individuals with musculoskeletal injuries and conditions. Some examples of orthopedic procedures are hip replacement surgery, knee replacement surgery, hand surgery, elbow surgery, shoulder surgery, and others.Orthopedists must be licensed to practice medicine. They also need to complete continuing education on a regular basis to upgrade their skills and maintain their license. Board certification demonstrates a doctor’s exceptional expertise in a particular specialty or subspecialty of medical practice. Keep in mind that board certification is voluntary. Don’t suffer from unnecessary pain. Locate an orthopedic surgeon in your area.

Posted in Joint Treatment

Sunday, May 20, 2012

U.S. Democratic Party presidential candidate John Wolfe, Jr. of Tennessee took some time to answer a few questions from Wikinews reporter William S. Saturn.

Wolfe, an attorney based out of Chattanooga, announced his intentions last year to challenge President Barack Obama in the Democratic Party presidential primaries. So far, he has appeared on the primary ballots in New Hampshire, Missouri, and Louisiana. In Louisiana, he had his strongest showing, winning 12 percent overall with over 15 percent in some congressional districts, qualifying him for Democratic National Convention delegates. However, because certain paperwork had not been filed, the party stripped Wolfe of the delegates. Wolfe says he will sue the party to receive them.

Wolfe will compete for additional delegates at the May 22 Arkansas primary and the May 29 Texas primary. He is the only challenger to Obama in Arkansas, where a May 10 Hendrix College poll of Democrats shows him with 38 percent support, just short of the 45 percent for Obama. Such an outing would top the margin of Texas prison inmate Keith Russell Judd, who finished 18 percent behind Obama with 41 percent in the West Virginia Democratic primary; the strongest showing yet against the incumbent president. Despite these prospects, the Democratic Party of Arkansas has already announced that if Wolfe wins any delegates in their primary, again, due to paperwork, the delegates will not be awarded. Wolfe will appear on the Texas ballot alongside Obama, activist Bob Ely, and historian Darcy Richardson, who ended his campaign last month.

Wolfe has previously run for U.S. Congress as the Democratic Party’s nominee. On his campaign website, he cites the influence “of the Pentagon, Wall Street, and corporations” on the Obama administration as a reason for his challenge, believing these negatively affect “loyal Americans, taxpayers and small businesses.” Wolfe calls for the usage of anti-trust laws to break up large banks, higher taxes on Wall Street, the creation of an “alternative federal reserve” to assist community banks, and the implementation of a single-payer health care system.

With Wikinews, Wolfe discusses his campaign, the presidency of Barack Obama, corporations, energy, the federal budget, immigration, and the nuclear situation in Iran among other issues.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Wikinews_interviews_John_Wolfe,_Democratic_Party_presidential_challenger_to_Barack_Obama&oldid=4567754”
Posted in Uncategorized

Sunday, July 11, 2010

A professional football player from Brazil and a former police investigator are among seven people arrested in connection with a murder police called “barbaric”. Flamengo goalkeeper, and captain, Bruno Fernandes is accused of hiring former policeman Marcos Aparecido dos Santos to kill his mistress.

Police say Fernandes met Eliza Samudio, 25, at a party organised by another Flamengo player last year, and spent the night with the former model and pornstar, impregnating her. Her refusal to abort the pregnancy is cited as the motive behind the killing. Samudio has been missing since June 4th. Police state she contacted them earlier to complain of violence and threats from Fernandes. He is alleged to have attacked her and tried to force her to swallow an abortion pill in a complaint filed in October. He supposedly told her, “[y]ou don’t know me and you don’t know what I am capable of – I’m from the favela.”

Police allege that Samudio was abducted from a hotel in Rio de Janerio and driven for six hours to reach a house belonging to Santos near Belo Horizonte. There, according to newspaper Estado de Sao Paulo, one of Fernandes’s cousins, allegedly involved, said loud music was played to cover up the screams as “barbaric tortures” were inflicted upon her by Santos.

It is alleged when she exclaimed she could no longer bear being beaten the ex-policeman responded “[y]ou are not going to bear it any more. You are going to die.” Souza is said to have been present and witnessed both her torture and her strangulation. Although she remains missing, police state that they are confident she is dead and claim her remains were disposed of by being fed to at least one rottweiler. Remaining parts are said to be encased in concrete.

The child, a boy, had already been born and is now four months old. Police say his mother was killed when she began attempts to prove the footballer, who was rumoured to have received an offer worth millions of dollars from AC Milan, was his father. Homicide investigator Edson Moreira is running the probe and was in no doubt of the footballing “idol”‘s guilt: “[he is] a monster for what he did to this young lady.”

The investigation has been a major focus for Brazilian media. The nation has an upcoming presidential election and candidates were quick to express their views. Dilma Rousseff, who present president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva wishes to succeed him, said “[t]his is a barbaric crime. The whole of Brazil is disgusted by such a barbaric and perverse crime.” Rainforest campaigner Marina Silva, another candidate, expressed concern that “[w]e have repeatedly seen this kind of episode against the lives of women.”

Fernandes denied any involvement, claiming a “clear conscience”. He has commented that he is concerned the investigation may hamper his prospects of representing Brazil at the 2014 World Cup. Currently in a jail cell, he was requested to provide DNA samples but exercised his constitutional right to refuse. His wife is also alleged to have been involved and is jailed as well. Santos has said, via his lawyer, that he too is uninvolved in any crimes.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_footballer,_ex-policeman_among_seven_arrested_for_%27barbaric%27_murder&oldid=4198887”
Posted in Uncategorized

Sunday, February 13, 2005Cordon-bleu chef Homaru Cantu has announced a technique which allows him to create dishes made of edible, inkjet printed paper. Cantu, a head chef at the Moto restaurant in Chicago, has modified an ink-jet printer with the help of computer specialists from local firm Deep Labs and loaded it with cartridges containing concoctions of fruit and vegetables. Using this modified printer Cantu then prints onto edible sheets of soybean and potato starch tasty images downloaded from the web.

“You can make an ink-jet printer do just about anything,” says Cantu. Once the items have been printed they are dipped into a powder made of soy sauce, sugar and vegetables before then being further processed by frying, freezing, or baking them.

Cantu has applied the technique to the printing of menus so that diners can further flavor their soups by ripping up the menu and adding it to the dish.

He hopes that his idea may find its way into popular media. “Just imagine going through a magazine and looking at an ad for pizza. You wonder what it tastes like, so you rip a page out and eat it,” says the chef who is working at perfecting the flavors and has applied for a patent on the technique.

Cantu also has plans for further culinary innovations. He plans to cook steak using a handheld laser that will sear the inside of the steak well done whilst leaving the outside medium rare. He also plans to use the laser to produce bread baked from the inside out thus producing a crust on the inside.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Chicago_chef_invents_edible_menu&oldid=1985407”
Posted in Uncategorized
TO TOP